Electronic structure and magnetic properties of the linear chain cuprates Sr_2CuO_3 and Ca_2CuO_3
H. Rosner, H. Eschrig, R. Hayn, S.-L. Drechsler, J. Malek

TL;DR
This study analyzes the electronic structure and magnetic interactions of Sr_2CuO_3 and Ca_2CuO_3 using band-structure calculations and experimental data, revealing differences in their magnetic coupling and providing a detailed model for their properties.
Contribution
It presents a comprehensive parameterization of extended Hubbard and Heisenberg models for these compounds based on band-structure and experimental data, highlighting differences in inter-chain interactions.
Findings
Ca_2CuO_3 has a lower bonding band energy than Sr_2CuO_3.
Inter-chain exchange constants are approximately 0.8 meV for Sr_2CuO_3 and 3.6 meV for Ca_2CuO_3.
The anisotropic Heisenberg model accurately reproduces magnetic properties like T_N and magnetization.
Abstract
Sr_2CuO_3 and Ca_2CuO_3 are considered to be model systems of strongly anisotropic, spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnets. We report on the basis of a band-structure analysis within the local density approximation and on the basis of available experimental data a careful analysis of model parameters for extended Hubbard and Heisenberg models. Both insulating compounds show half-filled nearly one-dimensional antibonding bands within the LDA. That indicates the importance of strong on-site correlation effects. The bonding bands of Ca_2CuO_3 are shifted downwards by 0.7 eV compared with Sr_2CuO_3, pointing to different Madelung fields and different on-site energies within the standard pd-model. Both compounds differ also significantly in the magnitude of the inter-chain dispersion along the crystallographical a-direction: \approx 100 meV and 250 meV, respectively. Using the band-structure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
