Out-of-plane instability and electron-phonon contribution to s- and d-wave pairing in high-temperature superconductors; LDA linear-response calculation for doped CaCuO2 and a generic tight-binding model
O.K. Andersen, S.Y. Savrasov, O. Jepsen, and A.I.Liechtenstein (Max, Planck Institut, Stuttgart, Germany)

TL;DR
This study uses LDA linear-response calculations to analyze electron-phonon interactions and out-of-plane instabilities in doped CaCuO2, revealing insights into their potential role in high-temperature superconductivity and pairing mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed LDA-based analysis of electron-phonon interactions in doped CaCuO2, highlighting the significance of buckling modes and their possible influence on d-wave pairing.
Findings
Electron-phonon coupling constant lambda(s)=0.4
Buckling modes significantly contribute to EPI
EPI alone is insufficient to explain HTSC
Abstract
The equilibrium structure, energy bands, phonon dispersions, and s- and d-channel electron-phonon interactions (EPIs) are calculated for the infinite-layer superconductor CaCuO2 doped with 0.24 holes per CuO2. The LDA and the linear-response full-potential LMTO method were used. In the equilibrium structure, oxygen is found to buckle slightly out of the plane and, as a result, the characters of the energy bands near EF are found to be similar to those of other optimally doped HTSCs. For the EPI we find lambda(s)=0.4, in accord with previous LDA calculations for YBa2Cu3O7. This supports the common belief that the EPI mechanism alone is insufficient to explain HTSC. Lambda(x^2-y^2) is found to be positive and nearly as large as lambda(s). This is surprising and indicates that the EPI could enhance some other d-wave pairing mechanism. Like in YBa2Cu3O7, the buckling modes contribute…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
