Comment on "Superconducting gap anisotropy vs. doping level in high-T_c cuprates" by C. Kendziora et al, PRL 77, 727 (1996)
K. Hewitt, T. Devereaux, X. K. Chen, X.-Z. Wang, J. Naeini, J.C., Irwin

TL;DR
This paper challenges prior conclusions that the superconducting gap in overdoped Bi-2212 is isotropic, proposing instead that it exhibits strong anisotropy with nodes, supported by new data and a refined theoretical model.
Contribution
The authors reinterpret existing Raman scattering data and present new measurements indicating a strongly anisotropic d_{x^{2}-y^{2}} gap with nodes in overdoped Bi-2212.
Findings
Data consistent with a d_{x^{2}-y^{2}} gap with nodes
Reinterpretation of Raman spectra supports anisotropic gap
Model includes spin fluctuations and impurity scattering
Abstract
In a recent paper Kendziora et al concluded that the superconducting gap in overdoped Bi-2212 is isotropic. From data obtained from electronic Raman scattering measurements, their conclusion was based on the observation that pair breaking peaks occured at approximately the same frequency in different scattering geometries and that the normalized scattering intensity at low energies was strongly depleted. We discuss a different interpretation of the raw data and present new data which is consistent with a strongly anisotropic gap with nodes. The spectra can be successfully described by a model for Raman scattering in a d_{x^{2}-y^{2}} superconductor with spin fluctuations and impurity scattering included.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
