Evidence for strong electron-phonon coupling and polarons in the optical response of La_{2-x}Sr_xCuO_4
O. V. Dolgov, H. J. Kaufmann, E. K. H. Salje, and Y. Yagil

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that the optical response of La_{2-x}Sr_xCuO_4 in both normal and superconducting states can be explained by a multi-fluid model emphasizing strong electron-phonon coupling and polaronic effects, aligning with observed spectral features.
Contribution
It introduces a simple multi-component model incorporating strong electron-phonon interactions and polaronic states to explain La_{2-x}Sr_xCuO_4's optical properties across different states.
Findings
Strong electron-phonon interaction explains optical scattering rates.
Polaronic states near 0.15 eV are significant in the optical response.
The model accounts for penetration depth and optical response below T_c.
Abstract
The normal state optical response of La_{2-x}Sr_xCuO_4 is found to be consistent with a simple multi-component model, based on free carriers with strong electron-phonon interaction, localized polaronic states near 0.15 eV and a mid-infrared band at 0.5 eV. Normal state reflectance and absorbance of La_{1.83}Sr_{0.17}CuO_4 are investigated and their temperature dependence is explained. Both, the ac and dc response are recovered and the quasi-linear behavior of the optical scattering rate up to 3000- 4000 cm^{-1} is found to be consistent with strong electron-phonon interaction, which also accounts for the value of T_c. Although not strictly applicable in the superconducting state, our simple model accounts for the observed penetration depth and the optical response below T_c can be recovered by introducing a small amount of additional carriers. Our findings suggest that the optical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
