Comment on ``Integrability and Coherence of Hopping between 1D Correlated Electron Systems''
David Clarke (Princeton), Steven Strong (IAS, Princeton)

TL;DR
This paper critiques recent numerical studies on coupled 1D electron liquids, emphasizing that observed integrability effects relate more to ergodicity than coherence, and suggests a better measure for coherence in interliquid hopping.
Contribution
It clarifies the role of integrability in coupled 1D electron systems and proposes a more suitable metric for assessing coherence in interliquid hopping.
Findings
Integrability impacts ergodicity, not coherence.
The quantity < δN(t) > better indicates coherence.
Critique of previous numerical interpretations.
Abstract
We comment on recent numerical studies concerning coupled 1D electron liquids (F. Mila and D. Poilblanc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 287 (1996)). In particular, we point out that the importance of integrability observed in the results of these authors for the quantity is really an indication of the importance of integrability for questions of ergodicity, rather than questions of coherence. We discuss why this is so, and why the quantity is a more appropriate function for determining whether or not interliquid hopping is coherent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOrganic and Molecular Conductors Research · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
