Anomalous superconducting state gap size versus Tc behavior in underdoped Bi_2Sr_2Ca_1-xDy_xCu_2O_8+d
J. M. Harris (1), Z.-X. Shen (1), P. J. White (1), D. S. Marshall (1),, M. C. Schabel (1), J. N. Eckstein (2), I. Bozovic (2) ((1) Stanford, University (2) Varian Associates)

TL;DR
This study uses angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy to investigate the behavior of the superconducting gap in underdoped Bi-2212 films, revealing a non-proportional relationship between the gap size and T_c and persistent anisotropic gaps above T_c.
Contribution
It demonstrates that in underdoped Bi-2212, the superconducting gap remains constant or increases despite decreasing T_c, challenging BCS theory and highlighting different energy scales.
Findings
Superconducting gap does not scale with T_c in underdoped samples.
The gap remains highly anisotropic and persists above T_c.
The gap size is independent of T_c, indicating different energy scales.
Abstract
We report angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy measurements of the excitation gap in underdoped superconducting thin films of Bi_2Sr_2Ca_{1-x}Dy_xCu_2O_{8+d}. As Tc is reduced by a factor of 2 by underdoping, the superconducting state gap \Delta does not fall proportionally, but instead stays constant or increases slightly, in violation of the BCS mean-field theory result. The different doping dependences of \Delta and kT_c indicate that they represent different energy scales. The measurements also show that \Delta is highly anisotropic and consistent with a d_{x^2-y^2} order parameter, as in previous studies of samples with higher dopings. However, in these underdoped samples, the anisotropic gap persists well above T_c. The existence of a normal state gap is related to the failure of \Delta to scale with T_c in theoretical models that predict pairing without phase coherence above…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
