Self - organized - criticality and synchronization in pulse coupled relaxation oscillator systems: the Olami, Feder and Christensen model and the Feder and Feder model
Samuele Bottani, Bertrand Delamotte

TL;DR
This paper reexamines the OFC model's dynamics, revealing that dissipation influences whether it exhibits self-organized criticality and synchronization, and shows that these phenomena can occur independently.
Contribution
It demonstrates that relaxation oscillator systems can be synchronized and/or SOC, clarifying that synchronization is not essential for criticality in these models.
Findings
OFC model exhibits different behaviors based on dissipation
Stochastic perturbation induces SOC without synchronization
Synchronization is not necessary for criticality in these models
Abstract
We reexamine the dynamics of the Olami, Feder and Christensen (OFC) model. We show that, depending on the dissipation, it exhibits two different behaviors and that it can or cannot show self - organized - criticality (SOC) and/or synchronization. We also show that while the Feder and Feder model perturbed by a stochastic noise is SOC and has the same exponent for the distribution of avalanche sizes as the OFC model, it does not show synchronization. We conclude that a relaxation oscillator system can be synchronized and/or SOC and that therefore synchronization is not necessary for criticality in these models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
