Is Heteropolymer Freezing Well Described by the Random Energy Model?
Vijay S. Pande, Alexander Yu. Grosberg, Chris Joerg, Toyoichi Tanaka, (Department of Physics, Center for Materials Science, Engineering,, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

TL;DR
This paper examines whether the Random Energy Model accurately describes heteropolymer freezing, revealing that key assumptions of REM are violated in common models, with implications for understanding protein behavior.
Contribution
The study challenges the applicability of REM to heteropolymer freezing by showing violations of its core assumptions in typical models.
Findings
REM's assumption of energy independence is violated in common heteropolymer models.
Implications for protein folding and stability are discussed.
The validity of REM for describing heteropolymer freezing is questioned.
Abstract
It is widely held that the Random Energy Model (REM) describes the freezing transition of a variety of types of heteropolymers. We demonstrate that the hallmark property of REM, statistical independence of the energies of states over disorder, is violated in different ways for models commonly employed in heteropolymer freezing studies. The implications for proteins are also discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
