Some thoughts about nonequilibrium temperature
L.S. Garcia-Colin, V. Micenmacher

TL;DR
This paper argues that within kinetic theory, there is no evidence to modify the classical Fourier law by replacing temperature with a non-equilibrium temperature, challenging recent proposals in extended thermodynamics.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the traditional temperature remains valid in non-equilibrium steady states within the kinetic framework, countering recent claims for a non-equilibrium temperature.
Findings
No kinetic evidence supports replacing temperature with non-equilibrium temperature.
Classical Fourier law remains valid in non-equilibrium steady states.
Extended Irreversible Thermodynamics' temperature concept lacks kinetic foundation.
Abstract
The main objective of this paper is to show that, within the present framework of the kinetic theoretical approach to irreversible thermodynamics, there is no evidence that provides a basis to modify the ordinary Fourier equation relating the heat flux in a non-equilibrium steady state to the gradient of the local equilibrium temperature. This fact is supported, among other arguments, through the kinetic foundations of generalized hydrodynamics. Some attempts have been recently proposed asserting that, in the presence of non-linearities of the state variables, such a temperature should be replaced by the non-equilibrium temperature as defined in Extended Irreversible Thermodynamics. In the approximations used for such a temperature there is so far no evidence that sustains this proposal.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
