SURFACE INDUCED FINITE-SIZE EFFECTS FOR FIRST ORDER PHASE TRANSITIONS

TL;DR

This paper analyzes how surface effects influence finite-size scaling in first-order phase transitions, deriving formulas for shifts in transition points and susceptibility maxima in systems with free boundary conditions.

Contribution

It provides explicit formulas for finite-size shifts of transition points and susceptibilities considering surface effects, highlighting differences from periodic boundary conditions.

Findings

Surface free energies cause a $1/L$ shift in transition points.

Finite-size susceptibility maxima are shifted by $1/L$.

Surface effects lead to different scaling behavior compared to periodic boundaries.

Abstract

We consider classical lattice models describing first-order phase transitions, and study the finite-size scaling of the magnetization and susceptibility. In order to model the effects of an actual surface in systems like small magnetic clusters, we consider models with free boundary conditions. For a field driven transition with two coexisting phases at the infinite volume transition point $h=h_t$, we prove that the low temperature finite volume magnetization $m_{\free}(L,h)$ per site in a cubic volume of size $L^d$ behaves like $m_\free(L,h)=\frac{m_++m_-}2 + \frac{m_+-m_-}2 \tanh \bigl(\frac{m_+-m_-}2\,L^d\, (h-h_\chi(L))\bigr)+O(1/L)$, where $h_\chi(L)$ is the position of the maximum of the (finite volume) susceptibility and $m_\pm$ are the infinite volume magnetizations at $h=h_t+0$ and $h=h_t-0$, respectively. We show that $h_\chi(L)$ is shifted by an amount proportional to $1/L$ with respect to the infinite volume transitions point $h_t$ provided the surface free energies of the two phases at the transition point are different. This should be compared with the shift for periodic boun\- dary conditons, which for an asymmetric transition with two coexisting phases is proportional only to $1/L^{2d}$. One also consider the position $h_U(L)$ of the maximum of the so called Binder cummulant $U_\free(L,h)$. While it is again shifted by an amount proportional to $1/L$ with respect to the infinite volume transition point $h_t$, its shift with respect to $h_\chi(L)$ is of the much smaller order $1/L^{2d}$. We give explicit formulas for the proportionality factors, and show that, in the leading $1/L^{2d}$ term, the relative shift is the same as that for periodic boundary conditions.