Criticality in Simple Models of Evolution
Jan de Boer, A.D. Jackson, and Tilo Wettig

TL;DR
This paper reexamines two models of biological evolution claimed to show self-organized criticality, revealing their differences, limitations of mean field analysis, and proposing clearer criteria for defining self-organized criticality.
Contribution
It provides a detailed reanalysis of two evolution models, introduces new analytic results, and discusses the need for a more precise definition of self-organized criticality.
Findings
Models are qualitatively different upon reanalysis
Mean field description has limitations
Proposes criteria for self-organized criticality
Abstract
We consider two, apparently similar, models of biological evolution which have been claimed to exhibit self-organized critical behaviour. A careful reanalysis of these models, including several new analytic results for one of them, suggests that they are qualitatively different. We demonstrate the limitations of the mean field description of these systems. We argue that a more precise definition of self-organized criticality is desirable and establish several criteria in this connection.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
