Critical and bicritical properties of Harper's equation with next nearest neighbor coupling
J. H. Han, D. J. Thouless, H. Hiramoto, M. Kohmoto

TL;DR
This paper investigates the critical and bicritical properties of Harper's equation with next nearest neighbor coupling, revealing conditions for universality, the role of symmetry, and the emergence of a bicritical line with distinct critical behavior.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the spectral scaling and multifractal properties remain stable under certain next nearest neighbor couplings and identifies a bicritical line with unique critical exponents and behaviors.
Findings
Spectral width scaling remains unchanged below a threshold coupling.
A bicritical line separates different dominant coupling regimes.
Critical behavior persists with reflection symmetry, but new length scales and oscillations appear.
Abstract
We have exploited a variety of techniques to study the universality and stability of the scaling properties of Harper's equation, the equation for a particle moving on a tight-binding square lattice in the presence of a gauge field, when coupling to next nearest sites is added. We find, from numerical and analytical studies, that the scaling behavior of the total width of the spectrum and the multifractal nature of the spectrum are unchanged, provided the next nearest neighbor coupling terms are below a certain threshold value. The full square symmetry of the Hamiltonian is not required for criticality, but the square diagonals should remain as reflection lines. A bicritical line is found at the boundary between the region in which the nearest neighbor terms dominate and the region in which the next nearest neighbor terms dominate. On the bicritical line a different critical exponent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
