Weak-Localization and Integrability in Ballistic Cavities
H. U. Baranger, R. A. Jalabert, and A. D. Stone

TL;DR
This paper investigates how weak localization effects influence magnetoconductance in ballistic cavities, revealing differences between chaotic and regular systems and comparing semiclassical and random matrix theory predictions.
Contribution
It demonstrates an interference contribution to magnetoconductance and tests semiclassical versus random matrix theory explanations in ballistic cavities.
Findings
G(B) differs qualitatively for chaotic and regular cavities
Semiclassical theory poorly explains the magnitude of G(B)
Random matrix theory aligns well with observed G(B)
Abstract
We demonstrate the existence of an interference contribution to the average magnetoconductance, G(B), of ballistic cavities and use it to test the semiclassical theory of quantum billiards. G(B) is qualitatively different for chaotic and regular cavities, an effect explained semiclassically by the differing classical distribution of areas. The magnitude of G(B) is poorly explained by the semiclassical theory of coherent backscattering (elastic enhancement factor)-- correlations beyond time-reversed pairs of trajectories must be included-- but is in agreement with random matrix theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
