A Hike in the Phases of the 1-in-3 Satisfiability
Elitza Maneva, Talya Meltzer, Jack Raymond, Andrea Sportiello, Lenka, Zdeborov\'a

TL;DR
This paper investigates the phase transitions in the random epsilon-1-in-3 satisfiability problem, analyzing how negation probability affects the problem's solvability and computational hardness using both rigorous and heuristic approaches.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of SAT/UNSAT and hardness transitions in the epsilon-1-in-3 SAT problem, combining rigorous proofs with heuristic insights.
Findings
Identifies the critical thresholds for SAT/UNSAT transitions.
Characterizes the hardness landscape across different negation probabilities.
Provides both theoretical and heuristic descriptions of phase transitions.
Abstract
We summarise our results for the random --1-in-3 satisfiability problem, where is a probability of negation of the variable. We employ both rigorous and heuristic methods to describe the SAT/UNSAT and Hard/Easy transitions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
