Comparative study of unscreened and screened molecular static linear polarizability in the Hartree-Fock, hybrid-density functional, and density functional models
Rajendra R. Zope, Tunna Baruah, Mark R. Pederson, Brett I. Dunlap, (UTEP, NRL)

TL;DR
This study compares sum-over-states and finite-field methods for calculating molecular polarizabilities across Hartree-Fock, B3LYP, and PBE models, revealing systematic overestimations and proposing a correction scheme.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of polarizability calculation methods and introduces a simple correction scheme to improve SOS estimates based on observed trends.
Findings
SOS overestimates B3LYP and PBE polarizabilities
Hartree-Fock predicts smaller polarizabilities than DFT models
Proposed correction scheme improves SOS estimates
Abstract
The sum-over-states (SOS) polarizabilities are calculated within the approximate independent electron theories such as the Hartree-Fock approximation and density functional models using the eigenvalues and orbitals obtained from the self-consistent solution of single-particle equations. The SOS polarizabilities are then compared with those calculated using the finite-field method within three widely used single particle models: (1) the Hartree-Fock (HF) method, (2) the three parameter hybrid generalized gradient approximation (B3LYP), and (3) the parameter free generalized gradient approximation due to Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE). The comparison is carried out for polarizabilities of 142 molecules calculated using the 6-311++G(d,p) orbital basis at the geometries optimized at the B3LYP/6-311G** level. The results show that the SOS method almost always overestimate the FF…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
