Two types of Hc2(T) dependences in Bi_2Sr_2Ca_(1-x)Y_xCu_2O_(8+delta) with different Yttrium content
I. L. Landau, H. Keller

TL;DR
This study reanalyzes magnetization data of Bi-2212 superconductors with varying yttrium content, revealing two distinct types of Hc2(T) dependencies and challenging previous interpretations based on inadequate analysis methods.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new analysis approach that corrects prior misinterpretations of Hc2(T) in Bi-2212, showing different doping levels lead to qualitatively different Hc2(T) behaviors.
Findings
Normalized Hc2(T) curves differ from previous results.
Hc2(T) dependencies do not follow Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg theory.
Two samples exhibit qualitatively different Hc2(T) behaviors.
Abstract
We reanalyze the magnetization data collected on Bi_2Sr_2Ca_(1-x)Y_xCu_2O_(8+y) samples (Kim at al, Phys. Rev. B 72, 64525 (2005)) and argue that the method, which was used for the analysis of equilibrium magnetization data, is not adequate to the experimental situation. As a result, the temperature dependencies of the upper critical field Hc2(T) and the magnetic field penetration depth lambda (T), obtained in this work, are misinterpreted. Using a different approach to analysis, we demonstrate that the normalizedHc2(T) curves are rather different from those presented in the original publication and do not follow predictions of the Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg theory. Another important observation is that the Hc2(T) dependencies for two samples with different levels of doping are qualitatively different.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
