Anderson Transition and Generalized Lyapunov Exponents (comment on comment by P.Markos, L.Schweitzer and M.Weyrauch, cond-mat/0402068)
I. M. Suslov

TL;DR
This paper critiques recent approaches to using generalized Lyapunov exponents in Anderson transition theory, clarifying misconceptions and contrasting different methodologies in the literature.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of recent claims about generalized Lyapunov exponents and clarifies the correct approach in the context of Anderson transition theory.
Findings
Markos et al.'s approach is incorrect
Differences between Kuzovkov et al. and the author’s methods are discussed
Clarification of the proper use of generalized Lyapunov exponents in the theory
Abstract
The generalized Lyapunov exponents describe the growth of the second moments for a particular solution of the quasi-1D Schroedinger equation with initial conditions on the left end. Their possible application in the Anderson transition theory became recently a subject for controversy in the literature. The approach to the problem of the second moments advanced by Markos et al (cond-mat/0402068) is shown to be trivially incorrect. The difference of approaches by Kuzovkov et al (cond-mat/0212036, cond-mat/0501446) and the present author (cond-mat/0504557, cond-mat/0512708) is discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and statistical mechanics · Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation · Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
