Electroneutrality and Phase Behavior of Colloidal Suspensions
A. R. Denton

TL;DR
This paper investigates the phase behavior of highly charged colloidal suspensions, showing that the choice of reference system and electroneutrality constraints critically influence predicted phase stability and separation.
Contribution
It unifies Poisson-Boltzmann and response theories within a perturbative framework emphasizing electroneutrality, clarifying when bulk phase separation predictions are physically consistent.
Findings
Bulk suspensions require density-dependent effective interactions for accurate phase predictions.
Linearized theories predict phase separation only with a closed, electroneutral reference system.
Lower-dimensional systems may behave differently, with density-independent interactions linked to open reference systems.
Abstract
Several statistical mechanical theories predict that colloidal suspensions of highly charged macroions and monovalent microions can exhibit unusual thermodynamic phase behavior when strongly deionized. Density-functional, extended Debye-H\"uckel, and response theories, within mean-field and linearization approximations, predict a spinodal phase instability of charged colloids below a critical salt concentration. Poisson-Boltzmann cell model studies of suspensions in Donnan equilibrium with a salt reservoir demonstrate that effective interactions and osmotic pressures predicted by such theories can be sensitive to the choice of reference system, e.g., whether the microion density profiles are expanded about the average potential of the suspension or about the reservoir potential. By unifying Poisson-Boltzmann and response theories within a common perturbative framework, it is shown here…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
