Distinct doping dependences of the pseudogap and superconducting gap La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_4$ cuprate superconductors
M. Hashimoto, T. Yoshida, K. Tanaka, A. Fujimori, M. Okusawa, S., Wakimoto, K. Yamada, T. Kakeshita, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida

TL;DR
This study reveals that in La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_4$ cuprates, the pseudogap and superconducting gap depend differently on doping levels, with the pseudogap increasing as doping decreases, while the superconducting gap remains small.
Contribution
It provides experimental evidence that the pseudogap and superconducting gap have distinct doping dependences and spatial origins in cuprate superconductors.
Findings
Pseudogap magnitude and onset temperature increase with decreasing doping.
Superconducting gap remains small as doping decreases.
Pseudogap opens around ($\pi$, 0), while the superconducting gap appears on the Fermi arc.
Abstract
We have performed a temperature-dependent angle-integrated photoemission study of lightly-doped to heavily-overdoped LaSrCuO and oxygen-doped LaCuO. We found that both the magnitude * of the (small) pseudogap and the temperature \textit{T}* at which the pseudogap is opened increases with decreasing hole concentration, consistent with previous studies. On the other hand, the superconducting gap was found to remain small for decreasing hole concentration. The results can be explained if the superconducting gap opens only on the Fermi arc around the nodal (0,0)-() direction while the pseudogap opens around (, 0).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
