Anderson transition: numerical vs analytical results (comment on the review article by P.Markos cond-mat/0609580)
I. M. Suslov

TL;DR
This paper discusses the discrepancies between numerical and analytical results concerning the critical behavior of the Anderson transition, highlighting unresolved conflicts and providing an analysis of the situation.
Contribution
It offers a critical analysis of the conflicting numerical and analytical findings on the Anderson transition's critical behavior.
Findings
Numerical results conflict with analytical expectations.
The paper analyzes reasons for discrepancies.
Highlights need for further investigation.
Abstract
In the recent review article, P.Markos admits that practically all numerical results on the critical behavior near the Anderson transition are in conflict with analytical expectations, but no serious discussion of this fact is given. The aim of the present comment is to give an analysis of the arising situation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTheoretical and Computational Physics · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
