A number-conserving approach to a minimal self-consistent treatment of condensate and non-condensate dynamics in a degenerate Bose gas
S. A. Gardiner, S.A. Morgan

TL;DR
This paper develops a number-conserving theoretical framework for accurately modeling the coupled dynamics of condensate and non-condensate particles in a Bose-Einstein condensate, especially at finite temperatures or during instabilities.
Contribution
It introduces a second-order dynamical treatment based on a generalized Gross-Pitaevskii equation coupled with Castin-Dum equations, extending previous approaches to finite particle number systems.
Findings
Provides a consistent coupled condensate and non-condensate dynamics model.
Applicable to finite temperature and dynamical instability scenarios.
Derived from an approximate third-order Hamiltonian, reducing to second order in steady state.
Abstract
We describe a number conserving approach to the dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensed dliute atomic gases. This builds upon the works of Gardiner [C. W. Gardiner, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1414 (1997)], and Castin and Dum [Y. Castin and R. Dum, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3008 (1998)]. We consider what is effectively an expansion in powers of the ratio of non-condensate to condensate particle numbers, rather than inverse powers of the total number of particles. This requires the number of condensate particles to be a majority, but not necessarily almost equal to the total number of particles in the system. We argue that a second-order treatment of the relevant dynamical equations of motion is the minimum order necessary to provide consistent coupled condensate and non-condensate number dynamics for a finite total number of particles, and show that such a second-order treatment is provided by a suitably…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
