Comparison of near-interface traps in Al$_2$O$_3$/4H-SiC and Al$_2$O$_3$/SiO$_2$/4H-SiC structures
Marc Avice, Ulrike Grossner, Ioana Pintilie, Bengt G. Svensson, Ola, Nilsen, Helmer Fjellvag

TL;DR
This study compares the interface trap densities in Al2O3/4H-SiC structures with and without an SiO2 interlayer, revealing differences in trap distributions that impact the potential for high-performance SiC-based MOSFETs.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of near-interface traps in Al2O3/4H-SiC structures with different interfacial layers, highlighting their impact on device performance.
Findings
Al2O3/SiO2/4H-SiC has a high trap density at 0.3 eV below Ec.
Al2O3/4H-SiC exhibits a nearly trap-free region near Ec.
Trap densities vary between 0.4 to 0.6 eV below Ec.
Abstract
Aluminum oxide (Al2O3) has been grown by atomic layer deposition on n-type 4H-SiC with and without a thin silicon dioxide (SiO2) intermediate layer. By means of Capacitance Voltage and Thermal Dielectric Relaxation Current measurements, the interface properties have been investigated. Whereas for the samples with an interfacial SiO2 layer the highest near-interface trap density is found at 0.3 eV below the conduction band edge, Ec, the samples with only the Al2O3 dielectric exhibit a nearly trap free region close to Ec. For the Al2O3/SiC interface, the highest trap density appears between 0.4 to 0.6 eV below Ec. The results indicate the possibility for SiC-based MOSFETs with Al2O3 as the gate dielectric layer in future high performance devices.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
