Checkerboard and stripe inhomogeneities in cuprates
G. Seibold, J. Lorenzana, and M. Grilli

TL;DR
This study explores charge-ordering phases in cuprates using a Gutzwiller approximation, revealing that stripe or checkerboard patterns dominate depending on the hopping parameters, with checkerboards favored at surfaces and a fixed periodicity.
Contribution
It demonstrates how the ratio of next-nearest to nearest neighbor hopping influences the emergence of stripe or checkerboard charge orders in cuprates.
Findings
Stripes occur when |t'/t| is small, typical for La2-xSrxCuO4.
Checkerboard structures are favored at larger |t'/t|, as in Ca2-xNaxCuO2Cl2 and Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ.
Checkerboard charge periodicity remains locked at 4 units over a wide doping range.
Abstract
We systematically investigate charge-ordering phases by means of a restricted and unrestricted Gutzwiller approximation to the single-band Hubbard model with nearest () and next-nearest neighbor hopping (). When is small, as appropriate for , stripes are found, whereas in compounds with larger (such as and ) checkerboard structures are favored. In contrast to the linear doping dependence found for stripes the charge periodicity of checkerboard textures is locked to 4 unit cells over a wide doping range. In addition we find that checkerboard structures are favored at surfaces.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
