Are better conducting molecules more rigid?
Young-Ho Eom, Hawoong Jeong, Juyeon Yi, Henri Orland

TL;DR
This paper explores the electronic factors influencing the bending stiffness of conducting molecules, revealing how molecular orbital overlap and doping affect flexibility and how electro-stiffness varies with applied voltage.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of electro-stiffness, linking electronic structure to mechanical flexibility, and analyzes how doping and voltage bias influence molecular stiffness.
Findings
Electro-stiffness depends on orbital overlap and energy gap.
Doped molecules are more flexible.
Voltage bias causes nonlinear changes in molecule length and stiffness.
Abstract
We investigate the electronic origin of the bending stiffness of conducting molecules. It is found that the bending stiffness associated with electronic motion, which we refer to as electro-stiffness, , is governed by the molecular orbital overlap and the gap width between HOMO and LUMO levels, and behaves as . To study the effect of doping, we analyze the electron filling-fraction dependence on and show that doped molecules are more flexible. In addition, to estimate the contribution of to the total stiffness, we consider molecules under a voltage bias, and study the length contraction ratio as a function of the voltage. The molecules are shown to be contracted or dilated, with increasing nonlinearly with the applied bias.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
