Comment on Phys. Rev. Lett.'s paper "All-Electron Self-Consistent GW Approximation: Application to Si, MnO, and NiO": band vs localized description of NiO
R. J. Radwanski, Z. Ropka

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous study on NiO's electronic structure, arguing that a many-electron crystal electric field approach is more physically appropriate than a band picture, impacting how NiO's properties are modeled.
Contribution
It challenges the band picture as a starting point for NiO, advocating for the many-electron crystal electric field approach as more physically justified.
Findings
Supports the many-electron CEF approach for NiO
Critiques the band picture as less appropriate
Emphasizes the importance of electron correlations in NiO
Abstract
In contrary to authors of Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 126406 (2004) claiming "the band picture to be a reasonable starting point for the description of the electronic structure of NiO, much better than the ligand-field picture", we argue that the many-electron CEF approach is physically adequate starting point for discussion of the electronic structure and magnetism of NiO.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMagnetic Properties and Applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
