Additional information for the paper `Attempt to distinguish long range temporal correlations from the statistics of the increments by natural time analysis' after its initial submission on February 25, 2006. Part II, Updated
P.A. Varotsos, N.V. Sarlis, E.S. Skordas, H.K. Tanaka, M.S., Lazaridou

TL;DR
This paper uses natural time analysis to identify the timing of earthquake activity following seismic electric signals, demonstrating the method's effectiveness in pinpointing earthquake initiation within a narrow timeframe.
Contribution
It applies natural time analysis to recent seismic data to accurately determine the start of earthquake activity after seismic electric signals.
Findings
Seismic activity began within two days of SES on February 13, 2006.
Natural time analysis effectively identifies earthquake initiation times.
The method provides precise timing for earthquake prediction efforts.
Abstract
As mentioned in the preceding additional information (hereafter called Part I), a series of strong earthquakes with magnitudes between 5.2 and 5.9-units occurred during the two weeks period: 3 to 19 April, 2006 with epicenters lying at distances 80 to 100 km west of PAT station. Here, we show that the analysis in the natural time of the seismicity that occurred after the Seismic Electric Signals (SES) activity on February 13, 2006, specifies the occurrence time of the initiation of the aforementioned earthquake activity within a narrow range around two days. Furthermore, we provide the most recent information on some points mentioned in the main text.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
