Absence of long-ranged charge order in $\rm Na_{x}Ca_{2-x}CuO_{2}Cl_{2}$ at x=0.08
\c{S}erban Smadici, Peter Abbamonte, Munetaka Taguchi, Yuhki Kohsaka,, Takao Sasagawa, Masaki Azuma, Mikio Takano, Hidenori Takagi

TL;DR
This study investigates the presence of long-range charge order in NCCOC at x=0.08 using resonant soft x-ray scattering, finding no evidence of the checkerboard pattern observed in STM, thus challenging its relation to stripe order.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the checkerboard DOS modulation in NCCOC is not related to stripe order, suggesting alternative electronic behaviors or surface effects.
Findings
No 4a×4a DOS modulation detected with RSXS
Checkerboard pattern not directly related to stripe order
Indications of glassy electronic behavior or surface phase transition
Abstract
A periodic density of states (DOS) modulation (a "checkerboard pattern") was observed with STM in (NCCOC) [T. Hanaguri \emph{et al.}, Nature \textbf{430}, 1001 (2004)]. Its periodicity is the same as that of the "stripe" charge order observed with neutron scattering in (LBCO) [J. M. Tranquada \emph{et al.}, Nature \textbf{429}, 534 (2004)] and (LNSCO) [J. M. Tranquada \emph{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{54}, 7489 (1996)]. An obvious question is whether the "stripes" are actually "checkers". Unfortunately, because NCCOC samples are small and LBCO samples do not cleave, neutron and STM measurements cannot be carried out on the same system. To determine the relationship between stripes and checkers we used resonant soft x-ray scattering (RSXS), previously applied to LBCO [P.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
