Reply to Comment on "Strongly Correlated Fractional Quantum Hall Line Junctions"
U. Zuelicke (Massey U), E. Shimshoni (U of Haifa)
TL;DR
This paper defends a previously developed transport theory for fractional quantum Hall edge channels against critiques, reaffirming the validity of the analytical conductance results in the context of extended tunnel junctions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed rebuttal to critiques of their earlier theoretical approach, clarifying the robustness of their conductance calculations for quantum Hall edge channels.
Findings
The critique by Ponomarenko and Averin is unwarranted.
The original transport theory remains valid.
Analytical conductance results are reaffirmed.
Abstract
In two recent articles [PRL 90, 026802 (2003); PRB 69, 085307 (2004)], we developed a transport theory for an extended tunnel junction between two interacting fractional-quantum-Hall edge channels, obtaining analytical results for the conductance. Ponomarenko and Averin (PA) have expressed disagreement with our theoretical approach and question the validity of our results (cond-mat/0602532). Here we show why PA's critique is unwarranted.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.