Nodal-antinodal dichotomy and magic doping fractions in a stripe ordered antiferromagnet
Mats Granath

TL;DR
This study models stripe-ordered doped antiferromagnets, revealing a dichotomy between delocalized nodal states and localized antinodal states, and identifies doping-dependent effects on resistivity.
Contribution
It introduces a coupled Hubbard ladder model to explore stripe order, uncovering a nodal-antinodal dichotomy and an even-odd charge periodicity effect.
Findings
Nodal states are delocalized and two-dimensional near (rac{rac}{2},rac{rac}{2})
Antinodal states are quasi-one-dimensional and localized near (rac{rac}{2},0)
Charge periodicity exhibits an even-odd effect influencing resistivity variations
Abstract
We study a model of a stripe ordered doped antiferromagnet consisting of coupled Hubbard ladders which can be tuned from quasi-one-dimensional to two-dimensional. We solve for the magnetization and charge density on the ladders by Hartree-Fock theory and find a set of solutions with lightly doped ``spin-stripes'' which are antiferromagnetic and more heavily doped anti-phase ``charge-stripes''. Both the spin- and charge-stripes have electronic spectral weight near the Fermi energy but in different regions of the Brillouin zone; the spin-stripes in the ``nodal'' region, near (\pi/2,\pi/2), and the charge-stripes in the ``antinodal'' region, near (\pi,0). We find a striking dichotomy between nodal and antinodal states in which the nodal states are essentially delocalized and two-dimensional whereas the antinodal states are quasi-one-dimensional, localized on individual charge-stripes. For…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
