Doped carrier formulation and mean-field theory of the tt't''J model

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new doped carrier formulation and a mean-field theory for the tt't''J model, providing insights into high-temperature superconductivity and reproducing phase diagrams of cuprates.

Contribution

It develops a novel fermionic mean-field approach based on doped carriers, revealing spinon-dopon mixing as a mechanism for superconductivity in the tt't''J model.

Findings

Reproduces semi-quantitative phase diagrams of cuprates

Accounts for local antiferromagnetic and d-wave superconducting correlations

Highlights the role of t', t'' in enhancing superconductivity

Abstract

In the generalized-tJ model the effect of the large local Coulomb repulsion is accounted for by restricting the Hilbert space to states with at most one electron per site. In this case the electronic system can be viewed in terms of holes hopping in a lattice of correlated spins, where holes are the carriers doped into the half-filled Mott insulator. To explicitly capture the interplay between the hole dynamics and local spin correlations we derive a new formulation of the generalized-tJ model where doped carrier operators are used instead of the original electron operators. This ``doped carrier'' formulation provides a new starting point to address doped spin systems and we use it to develop a new, fully fermionic, mean-field description of doped Mott insulators This mean-field approach reveals a new mechanism for superconductivity, namely spinon-dopon mixing, and we apply it to the tt't''J model as of interest to high-temperature superconductors. In particular, we use model parameters borrowed from band calculations and from fitting ARPES data to obtain a mean-field phase diagram that reproduces semi-quantitatively that of hole and electron doped cuprates. The mean-field approach hereby presented accounts for the local antiferromagnetic and d-wave superconducting correlations which, we show, provide a rational for the role of t' and t'' in strengthening superconductivity as expected by experiments and other theoretical approaches. As we discuss how t, t' and t'' affect the phase diagram, we also comment on possible scenarios to understand the differences between as-grown and oxygen reduced electron doped samples.