An evaluation of plastic flow stress models for the simulation of high-temperature and high-strain-rate deformation of metals
Biswajit Banerjee

TL;DR
This paper compares five phenomenological plastic flow stress models for simulating high-temperature, high-strain-rate deformation of metals, focusing on their accuracy and applicability to OFHC copper.
Contribution
It provides a systematic evaluation of five flow stress models against experimental data and impact tests, highlighting their strengths and limitations in different regimes.
Findings
All models are accurate at low temperatures.
Model accuracy varies significantly at high temperatures and strain rates.
OFHC copper's behavior is well characterized for model validation.
Abstract
Phenomenological plastic flow stress models are used extensively in the simulation of large deformations of metals at high strain-rates and high temperatures. Several such models exist and it is difficult to determine the applicability of any single model to the particular problem at hand. Ideally, the models are based on the underlying (subgrid) physics and therefore do not need to be recalibrated for every regime of application. In this work we compare the Johnson-Cook, Steinberg-Cochran-Guinan-Lund, Zerilli-Armstrong, Mechanical Threshold Stress, and Preston-Tonks-Wallace plasticity models. We use OFHC copper as the comparison material because it is well characterized. First, we determine parameters for the specific heat model, the equation of state, shear modulus models, and melt temperature models. These models are evaluated and their range of applicability is identified. We then…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
