Finite size scaling as a cure for supercell approximation errors in calculations of neutral native defects in InP
C.W.M. Castleton (1,2), S. Mirbt (3) ((1) Materials and, Semiconductor Physics Laboratory, KTH, Sweden, (2) Department of Physical, Electronics/Photonics, Mid Sweden University, Sweden (3) Department of, Physics, Uppsala University, Sweden)

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that finite size scaling effectively corrects supercell approximation errors in ab initio calculations of neutral defects in InP, enabling more accurate defect formation energy predictions.
Contribution
It introduces finite size scaling methods to correct supercell errors in defect calculations, showing their effectiveness even for large supercells.
Findings
Finite size errors scale linearly for elastic interactions.
Charge multipole interaction errors have linear and cubic components.
Supercells larger than 512 atoms may still require finite size scaling for accuracy.
Abstract
The relaxed and unrelaxed formation energies of neutral antisites and interstitial defects in InP are calculated using ab initio density functional theory and simple cubic supercells of up to 512 atoms. The finite size errors in the formation energies of all the neutral defects arising from the supercell approximation are examined and corrected for using finite size scaling methods, which are shown to be a very promising approach to the problem. Elastic errors scale linearly, whilst the errors arising from charge multipole interactions between the defect and its images in the periodic boundary conditions have a linear plus a higher order term, for which a cubic provides the best fit. These latter errors are shown to be significant even for neutral defects. Instances are also presented where even the 512 atom supercell is not sufficiently converged. Instead, physically relevant results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
