Comment on a Phys. Rev. Lett. paper: "All-Electron Self-Consistent GW Approximation: Application to Si, MnO, and NiO". Magnetic moment of NiO
R. J. Radwanski, Z. Ropka

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous study on NiO's magnetic properties, emphasizing the importance of including spin-orbit coupling and orbital magnetism for accurate theoretical modeling.
Contribution
It highlights the necessity of considering spin-orbit coupling and orbital magnetism in theoretical approaches to 3d oxides like NiO.
Findings
Previous models used too small experimental magnetic moment values.
Corrected experimental value is 2.2 muB at 300 K, 2.6 muB at 0 K.
Neglecting spin-orbit coupling leads to physically inadequate results.
Abstract
We claim that any approach neglecting the spin-orbit coupling and the orbital magnetism is not physically adequate for 3d oxides, including NiO, and that in reaching "excellent agreement" in a Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 126406 (2004) paper too small experimental value of 1.9 muB has been taken for the Ni magnetic moment despite publication of a new experimental value of 2.2 muB, at 300 K yielding 2.6 muB at T = 0 K, already in a year of 1998.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigh-pressure geophysics and materials · Nuclear Physics and Applications · Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
