Dynamical field theory for glass-forming liquids, self-consistent resummations and time-reversal symmetry
A. Andreanov, G. Biroli, A. Lefevre

TL;DR
This paper develops a symmetry-preserving dynamical field theory approach for glass-forming liquids, ensuring fluctuation-dissipation relations are maintained, and revises mode-coupling theory to accurately describe the glass transition.
Contribution
It introduces a nonlinear field transformation framework that preserves time-reversal symmetry in dynamical theories, correcting previous violations in mode-coupling theory.
Findings
Symmetry-preserving perturbation theories automatically maintain fluctuation-dissipation relations.
Revised mode-coupling equations do not predict a finite-order cutoff of the glass transition.
Incorrect treatment of time-reversal symmetry led to previous inaccuracies in field theoretical approaches.
Abstract
We analyse the symmetries and the self-consistent perturbative approaches of dynamical field theories for glassforming liquids. In particular, we focus on the time-reversal symmetry (TRS), which is crucial to obtain fluctuation-dissipation relations (FDRs). Previous field theoretical treatment violated this symmetry, whereas others pointed out that constructing symmetry preserving perturbation theories is a crucial and open issue. In this work we solve this problem and then apply our results to the mode-coupling theory of the glass transition (MCT). We show that in the context of dynamical field theories for glass-forming liquids TRS is expressed as a nonlinear field transformation that leaves the action invariant. Because of this nonlinearity, standard perturbation theories generically do not preserve TRS and in particular FDRs. We show how one can cure this problem and set up…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
