Crystalline Particle Packings on a Sphere with Long Range Power Law Potentials
Mark J. Bowick, Angelo Cacciuto, David R. Nelson, Alex Travesset

TL;DR
This paper investigates the ground states of particles with long-range power law interactions on a sphere, extending the classical Thomson problem, and develops a continuum elastic model to analyze defect structures and energy scaling.
Contribution
It introduces a continuum elastic framework for particles with 1/r^gamma interactions on a sphere, linking geometric defect interactions to potential-dependent energy terms.
Findings
The continuum model's first non-trivial coefficient matches numerical results for icosahedral configurations.
Discrepancies at higher order are due to configuration-specific energy contributions.
Large particle numbers lead to instabilities modeled by a Debye–Huckel solution with dislocation charges.
Abstract
The original Thomson problem of "spherical crystallography" seeks the ground state of electron shells interacting via the Coulomb potential; however one can also study crystalline ground states of particles interacting with other potentials. We focus here on long range power law interactions of the form 1/r^gamma (0 < \gamma < 2), with the classic Thomson problem given by gamma=1. At large R/a, where R is the sphere radius and a is the particle spacing, the problem can be reformulated as a continuum elastic model that depends on the Young's modulus of particles packed in the plane and the universal (independent of the pair potential) geometrical interactions between disclination defects. The energy of the continuum model can be expressed as an expansion in powers of the total number of particles, M sim (R/a)^2, with coefficients explicitly related to both geometric and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
