Stability of smectic phases in hard-rod mixtures
Yuri Martinez-Raton, Enrique Velasco, Luis Mederos

TL;DR
This study uses density-functional theory to compare the stability of smectic and columnar phases in binary mixtures of hard rods, revealing that orientation restrictions significantly influence phase stability.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of smectic and columnar phase stability using two theoretical models, including a novel phase diagram with full correlation details.
Findings
Restricted orientations favor columnar phases over smectic.
Full orientational freedom allows coexistence of smectic and columnar phases.
Columnar phases can dominate in certain mixtures depending on the model.
Abstract
Using density-functional theory, we have analyzed the phase behavior of binary mixtures of hard rods of different lengths and diameters. Previous studies have shown a strong tendency of smectic phases of these mixtures to segregate and, in some circumstances, to form microsegregated phases. Our focus in the present work is on the formation of columnar phases which some studies, under some approximations, have shown to become thermodynamically stable prior to crystallization. Specifically we focus on the relative stability between smectic and columnar phases, a question not fully addressed in previous work. Our analysis is based on two complementary perspectives: on the one hand, an extended Onsager theory, which includes the full orientational degrees of freedom but with spatial and orientational correlations being treated in an approximate manner; on the other hand, we formulate a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
