Suppressed magnetization in La$_{0.7}$Ca$_{0.3}$MnO$_3$/YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-\delta}$ superlattices
A. Hoffmann, S. G. E. te Velthuis, Z. Sefroui, J. Santamaria, M. R., Fitzsimmons, S. Park, and M. Varela

TL;DR
This study investigates how the magnetic properties of La$_{0.7}$Ca$_{0.3}$MnO$_3$/YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-\delta}$ superlattices are affected by interface interactions, revealing suppressed magnetization linked to charge transfer at the interface.
Contribution
It provides detailed insights into the magnetization suppression mechanism at the interface of these superlattices, combining magnetometry, neutron reflectometry, and spectroscopy.
Findings
Magnetization decreases with increasing YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-\delta}$ layer thickness.
Magnetization suppression is due to inhomogeneous depth profile near the interface.
Charge transfer causes increased Mn 3d band occupation, leading to ferromagnetic order suppression.
Abstract
We studied the magnetic properties of LaCaMnO / YBaCuO superlattices. Magnetometry showed that with increasing YBaCuO layer thickness the saturation magnetization per LaCaMnO layer decreases. From polarized neutron reflectometry we determined that this magnetization reduction is due to an inhomogenous magnetization depth profile arising from the suppression of magnetization near the LaCaMnO / YBaCuO interface. Electron energy loss spectroscopy indicates an increased 3d band occupation of the Mn atoms in the LaCaMnO layers at the interface. Thus, the suppression of ferromagnetic order at the LaCaMnO / YBaCuO interface is most likely due to charge transfer between the two materials.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
