Comment on "Scaling of the linear response in simple aging systems without disorder"
Federico Corberi, Eugenio Lippiello, and Marco Zannetti

TL;DR
This paper revisits previous simulations of ferromagnetic systems' susceptibility, clarifying that the decay exponent matches the linear response exponent, contrary to earlier claims, by analyzing the underlying assumptions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the susceptibility decay exponent equals the linear response exponent, correcting prior misinterpretations and clarifying the assumptions involved.
Findings
Exponent A equals exponent a in susceptibility decay.
Contradicts previous claim that A < a.
Clarifies assumptions in the original analysis.
Abstract
We have repeated the simulations of Henkel, Paessens and Pleimling (HPP) [Phys.Rev.E {\bf 69}, 056109 (2004)] for the field-cooled susceptibility in the quench of ferromagnetic systems to and below . We show that, contrary to the statement made by HPP, the exponent coincides with the exponent of the linear response function . We point out what are the assumptions in the argument of HPP that lead them to the conclusion .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
