Jamming in granular hopper flow
James W. Landry, Gary S. Grest

TL;DR
This study uses large-scale molecular dynamics simulations to analyze how force and impulse distributions evolve as granular hopper flow approaches jamming, revealing that impulse distribution is a more reliable indicator of jamming than force distribution.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the microscopic force and impulse distributions near jamming in granular hopper flow, highlighting the importance of impulse distribution as an indicator.
Findings
Force distribution $P(f)$ changes little near jamming
Impulse distribution $P(i)$ increases in small impulses approaching jamming
Impulse distribution is a stronger indicator of jamming than force distribution
Abstract
Large-scale three dimensional molecular dynamics simulations of hopper flow are presented. The flow rate of the system is controlled by the width of the aperture at the bottom. As the steady-state flow rate is reduced, the force distribution changes only slightly, while there is a large change in the impulse distribution . In both cases, the distributions show an increase in small forces or impulses as the systems approach jamming, the opposite of that seen in previous Lennard-Jones simulations. This occurs dynamically as well for a hopper that transitions from a flowing to a jammed state over time. The final jammed is quite distinct from a poured packing in the same geometry. The change in is a much stronger indicator of the approach to jamming. The formation of a peak or plateau in at the average force is not a general feature of the approach…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGranular flow and fluidized beds
