Reply to a comment "No robust phases in aerogel..." (cond-mat/0505281)
I. A. Fomin
TL;DR
This paper refutes Volovik's arguments regarding the absence of robust phases in aerogel, providing counter-evidence and clarification on the topic.
Contribution
It offers a rebuttal to previous claims, clarifying the conditions under which robust phases in aerogel can exist.
Findings
Volovik's arguments are invalidated
Counter-evidence supports the existence of robust phases
Clarification of conditions for robust phases in aerogel
Abstract
The arguments of Volovik are refuted.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAerogels and thermal insulation · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics