Comparing community structure identification
Leon Danon, Jordi Duch, Albert Diaz-Guilera, Alex Arenas

TL;DR
This paper compares recent community detection methods focusing on their accuracy and computational efficiency, highlighting the trade-offs and proposing a benchmark for evaluating such algorithms.
Contribution
It introduces a standard benchmark for community detection methods and analyzes the trade-offs between accuracy and computational cost.
Findings
More accurate methods are generally more computationally expensive.
The modularity measure is revisited and evaluated.
A benchmark test for community detection methods is proposed.
Abstract
We compare recent approaches to community structure identification in terms of sensitivity and computational cost. The recently proposed modularity measure is revisited and the performance of the methods as applied to ad hoc networks with known community structure, is compared. We find that the most accurate methods tend to be more computationally expensive, and that both aspects need to be considered when choosing a method for practical purposes. The work is intended as an introduction as well as a proposal for a standard benchmark test of community detection methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
