Wavelet versus Detrended Fluctuation Analysis of multifractal structures
Pawel Oswiecimka, Jaroslaw Kwapien, S. Drozdz

TL;DR
This study compares the effectiveness of MFDFA and WTMM methods in detecting multifractal structures in artificial and real financial data, recommending MFDFA for general use due to its reliability and automation capabilities.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive comparison of MFDFA and WTMM, highlighting the biases of WTMM and recommending MFDFA for more accurate and automatic multifractal analysis.
Findings
MFDFA is generally more reliable for unknown data properties.
WTMM can produce biased results, especially for fractional Brownian motion.
Both methods detect multifractality in stock market data, with WTMM indicating stronger multifractality.
Abstract
We perform a comparative study of applicability of the Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (MFDFA) and the Wavelet Transform Modulus Maxima (WTMM) method in proper detecting of mono- and multifractal character of data. We quantify the performance of both methods by using different sorts of artificial signals generated according to a few well-known exactly soluble mathematical models: monofractal fractional Brownian motion, bifractal Levy flights, and different sorts of multifractal binomial cascades. Our results show that in majority of situations in which one does not know a priori the fractal properties of a process, choosing MFDFA should be recommended. In particular, WTMM gives biased outcomes for the fractional Brownian motion with different values of Hurst exponent, indicating spurious multifractality. In some cases WTMM can also give different results if one applies…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
