Comment on 'Optimization of photonic crystal structures', J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 2223-2232 (2004)'
Andreas Hakansson, Jose Sanchez-Dehesa

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the effectiveness of stochastic global search strategies in photonic crystal optimization, highlighting potential pitfalls when applying simplified methods to complex, intractable problems.
Contribution
It provides a reanalysis of previous conclusions on global stochastic search strategies, emphasizing limitations in their applicability to complex optimization problems.
Findings
Global stochastic methods may be misleading for complex problems
Efficiency improvements in simplified test cases do not generalize
Caution is needed when applying these strategies to real-world intractable problems
Abstract
Recently, Smajic et al. published an article on numerical structural opti- mizations of two-dimensional photonic crystals using two different classes of optimization algorithms i.e, deterministic for local searches and stochastic for global. In this comment we reexamine some of their conclusions regarding the global stochastic search strategies. It is concluded that the steps taken to increase the efficiency of the optimization of the test problem chosen by Smajic et al., which was selected to keep the search space tractable, can be mislead- ing when applied to intractable problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhotonic Crystals and Applications · Photonic and Optical Devices · Optical Coatings and Gratings
