Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "
H. G. Luo, T. Xiang, X. Q. Wang, Z. B. Su, and L. Yu

TL;DR
This paper defends the authors' original analysis of Fano resonance in Anderson impurity systems against criticisms, asserting that the comments are unfounded and lack solid physical basis.
Contribution
It clarifies and reaffirms the validity of the original analysis, countering recent criticisms with a firm physical argument.
Findings
Criticisms are unjustified and lack physical basis
Original analysis remains valid and correct
Comments do not impact the validity of the original results
Abstract
In a recent Comment, Kolf et al. (cond-mat/0503669) state that our analysis of the Fano resonance for Anderson impurity systems [Luo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 92, 256602 (2004)] is incorrect. Here we want to point out that their comments are not based on firm physical results and their criticisms are unjustified and invalid.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
