Comment on the "Comment by Schwab, Blencowe, Roukes, Cleland, Girvin, Milburn, and Ekinci: quant-ph/0503018"

TL;DR

This paper refutes the invalid arguments presented in Schwab et al.'s comment on the authors' recent work, clarifying misconceptions and defending their original findings.

Contribution

It provides a direct rebuttal to Schwab et al.'s critique, reaffirming the validity of the authors' original research.

Findings

Schwab et al.'s arguments are invalid

The authors' original work remains correct

Clarification of misconceptions in the comment

Abstract

We show that arguments in the comment by Schwab et al. quant-ph/0503018 on our recent work are invalid.