Reply to Samuely et al. cond-mat/0503153
J. Kortus, O.V. Dolgov, R.K. Kremer, A.A. Golubov
TL;DR
This paper refutes claims that its results contradict established experiments, clarifying misinterpretations and defending its findings against prior assertions.
Contribution
It provides a clarification and correction to previous claims, emphasizing the accurate interpretation of experimental data.
Findings
Previous claims of contradiction are based on misinterpretation.
The authors clarify their results align with established experiments.
The paper defends the validity of their original findings.
Abstract
Samuely et al. (cond-mat/0503153) make the strong claim that our letter is 'contradicting several established experimental results'. As we will show below this is not justified and the claims from are based on a misinterpretation of our results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging