Distinct Pairing Symmetries in $Nd_{1.85}Ce_{0.15}CuO_{4-y}$ and $La_{1.89}Sr_{0.11}CuO_{4}$ Single Crystals: Evidence from Comparative Tunnelling Measurements
L. Shan, Y. Huang, H. Gao, Y. Wang, S. L. Li, Pengcheng Dai, F. Zhou,, J. W. Xiong, W. X. Ti, H.H. Wen

TL;DR
This study compares the pairing symmetries of electron- and hole-doped cuprate superconductors using tunnelling spectroscopy, revealing an s-wave component in electron-doped NCCO and a d-wave in hole-doped LSCO.
Contribution
It provides direct tunnelling evidence of distinct pairing symmetries in NCCO and LSCO, highlighting an s-wave component in NCCO's superconductivity.
Findings
NCCO shows no zero bias conductance peak in both orientations.
LSCO exhibits a zero bias conductance peak in the nodal direction.
NCCO has an s-wave component with Δ/kBTc≈1.66.
Abstract
We used point-contact tunnelling spectroscopy to study the superconducting pairing symmetry of electron-doped (NCCO) and hole-doped (LSCO). Nearly identical spectra without zero bias conductance peak (ZBCP) were obtained on the (110) and (100) oriented surfaces (the so-called nodal and anti-nodal directions) of NCCO. In contrast, LSCO showed a remarkable ZBCP in the nodal direction as expected from a d-wave superconductor. Detailed analysis reveals an s-wave component in the pairing symmetry of the NCCO sample with , a value remarkable close to that of a weakly coupled BCS superconductor. We argue that this s-wave component is formed at the Fermi surface pockets centered at (,0) and (0,) although a d-wave component may also exist.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
