Antiferromagnetic Order in Disorder-Induced Insulating Phase of SrRu_{1-x}Mn_xO_3 (0.4<x<0.6)
M. Yokoyama, C. Satoh, A. Saitou, H. Kawanaka, H. Bando, K. Ohoyama, and Y. Nishihara

TL;DR
This study reveals that Mn substitution in SrRuO_3 induces a transition from itinerant ferromagnetism to localized antiferromagnetic order, with enhanced magnetic moments and structural changes, highlighting the impact of disorder on magnetic phases.
Contribution
It demonstrates the emergence of C-type antiferromagnetic order in SrRu_{1-x}Mn_xO_3 for 0.4<x<0.6, showing how Mn substitution alters magnetic and electronic properties.
Findings
Transition from ferromagnetic to antiferromagnetic order with Mn doping
Increase in AF moment from 1.1 to 2.6 μB as x increases
Similar magnetic and transport properties in tetragonal and orthorhombic phases
Abstract
We have performed the powder neutron diffraction measurements on the solid solutions of SrRu_{1-x}Mn_xO_3, and found that the itinerant ferromagnetic order observed in pure SrRuO_3 changes into the C-type antiferromagnetic (AF) order with nearly localized d electrons in the intermediate Mn concentration between x=0.4 and 0.6. With increasing x, the AF moment is strongly enhanced from 1.1 mB (x=0.4) to 2.6 mB (x=0.6), which is accompanied by the elongation of the tetragonal c/a ratio. These results suggest that the substitution of Mn for Ru suppresses the itinerant character of the d electrons, and induces the superexchange interaction through the compression in the c plane. We have also found that the magnetic and transport properties observed in our tetragonal samples are quite similar to those of recently reported orthorhombic ones.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
