Structural matters in HTSC; the origin and form of stripe organization and checker boarding
John A. Wilson

TL;DR
This paper explores the role of stripe and checkerboard charge and spin organization in high-temperature superconductors, proposing models that reconcile experimental data and highlight the importance of real-space hole arrangements.
Contribution
It introduces 2q diagonal stripe models compatible with various experimental observations and links specific doping levels to superconducting properties within a boson-fermion framework.
Findings
Stripe models are 2q and diagonal, with face-centered charge and spin arrays.
Checkerboarding is linked to correlation-driven Fermi surface collapse.
Incommensurate spin diffraction is driven by charge and strain, not spin-wave physics.
Abstract
The paper deals with the controversial charge and spin self-organization phenomena in the HTSC cuprates, of which neutron, X-ray, STM and ARPES experiments give complementary, sometimes apparently contradictory glimpses. The examination has been set in the context of the boson-fermion, negative-U understanding of HTSC advocated over many years by the author. Stripe models are developed which are 2q in nature and diagonal in form. For such a geometry to be compatible with the data rests upon both the spin and charge arrays being face-centred. Various special doping concentrations are closely looked at, in particular p = 0.1836 or 9/49, which is associated with the maximization of the superconducting condensation energy and the termination of the pseudogap regime. The stripe models are dictated by real space organization of the holes, whereas the dispersionless checkerboarding is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
