Weak phase separation and the pseudogap in the electron-doped cuprates
M. Aichhorn, E. Arrigoni (TU Graz, Austria)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the quantum transition in electron- and hole-doped cuprates, revealing weak phase separation tendencies and explaining differences in pseudogap and transition scales.
Contribution
It introduces a variational cluster perturbation theory approach to compare phase separation in electron- and hole-doped cuprates, highlighting weaker phase separation in electron-doped materials.
Findings
Weak phase separation tendency in electron-doped cuprates
Energy scale for phase separation is much smaller in electron-doped cuprates
Differences in pseudogap and transition scales explained by phase separation energy
Abstract
We study the quantum transition from an antiferromagnet to a superconductor in a model for electron- and hole-doped cuprates by means of a variational cluster perturbation theory approach. In both cases, our results suggest a tendency towards phase separation between a mixed antiferromagnetic-superconducting phase at low doping and a pure superconducting phase at larger doping. However, in the electron-doped case the energy scale for phase separation is an order of magnitude smaller than for hole doping. We argue that this can explain the different pseudogap and superconducting transition scales in hole- and electron-doped materials.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
